Miss E Bracey v Miss E Finnie: 4103603/2025

15.Also, the mention of “flexible scheduling”raised in the respondent’s mind the concern that theclaimant would not, or would not be able to, meet her obligations to work for the respondent in her normal hours of 10am to 5pm, Monday to Thursday. A meeting was then arranged for the following day, 1 June 2025. 16.At the meeting on 1 June the respondent dismissed the claimant.