Mr K Gallagher v McKinnon’s Auto and Tyres Ltd: 4106291/2022

Firstly, the claimant had been invited to, and therefore expected to, attend a return to work meeting. There was no dispute regarding the fact the claimant was invited to attend a return to work meeting and that he did not know a protected conversation was going to take place. 15 Ms McKenzie was asked in cross examination whether she had misrepresented the purpose of the meeting. Ms McKenzie rejected that suggestion and said she had wanted to get the claimant in to work for a chat.