DismissalCheck← Back to case browserView the original decision on gov.uk ↗
Mr S Cohen v Ross & Liddell Ltd: 4103831/2025
Decided 2026-05-15· Scotland· Case No. 4103831/2025contract-of-employmentdisability-discriminationright-to-be-accompaniedUnfair Dismissalunlawful-deduction-from-wagesworking-time-regulations
JM does not reply to this question and, instead, asks him what happened on site. The claimant replies that he needs to know what the meeting is because he may be entitled to have someone accompany him. JM replies that he is not entitled to have someone accompany him and they are just having a chat about what happened on site. d. The claimant states that JM will not tell him what the meeting is and asks if it is an investigatory meeting.
Sign up free to read the full decision and ask how it applies to your situation.
Sign up free →